Y
Published on

Compare Ramda, Crocks, Lodash, Underscore, and RxJS

Authors
  • avatar
    Name
    Yinhuan Yuan
    Twitter
Introduction

Ramda, Crocks, Lodash, Underscore, and RxJS are four widely used JavaScript libraries. The post wants to summairze their functionalities.

1. Ramda

Ramda is a popular functional programming library for JavaScript that provides a set of utility functions to facilitate functional programming paradigms. Here's an overview of its key features and principles:

Core Principles

  1. Functional First: Ramda emphasizes a functional programming style, encouraging pure functions and immutability.

  2. Immutability: All functions in Ramda are pure and do not mutate data. They always return new data structures.

  3. Currying: All functions in Ramda are automatically curried, allowing for partial application of functions.

  4. Data-Last: Ramda functions typically take the data to operate on as their last argument, making them more composable.

Key Features

  1. Function Composition: Ramda provides utilities like R.compose and R.pipe for elegant function composition.

  2. List Operations: A wide array of functions for working with arrays, including map, filter, reduce, and more specialized operations.

  3. Object Operations: Functions for working with object properties, merging objects, and creating lenses for immutable updates.

  4. Logic Functions: Utilities for creating predicates and combining logical operations.

  5. Mathematical Operations: A set of mathematical functions that work well with Ramda's functional style.

  6. String Manipulation: Functions for working with strings in a functional manner.

  7. Type Checking: Utility functions for checking types in a functional way.

Common Functions

Some frequently used Ramda functions include:

  • R.map: Apply a function to each element in a list
  • R.filter: Filter a list based on a predicate
  • R.reduce: Reduce a list to a single value
  • R.compose: Compose functions right to left
  • R.pipe: Compose functions left to right
  • R.curry: Curry a function
  • R.prop: Extract a property from an object
  • R.path: Extract a nested property from an object
  • R.lens: Create a lens for immutable object updates

Example Usage

const R = require('ramda')

const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

const double = (x) => x * 2
const isEven = (x) => x % 2 === 0

const doubleEvenNumbers = R.pipe(R.filter(isEven), R.map(double))

console.log(doubleEvenNumbers(numbers)) // [4, 8]

const person = { name: 'Alice', age: 30 }
const getAge = R.prop('age')
console.log(getAge(person)) // 30

Benefits of Using Ramda

  1. Predictability: Pure functions and immutability lead to more predictable code.
  2. Reusability: Highly composable functions encourage code reuse.
  3. Readability: Expressive function names and composition can lead to more readable code.
  4. Testing: Pure functions are easier to test.

Considerations

  1. Learning Curve: The functional programming paradigm may require a shift in thinking for some developers.
  2. Performance: In some cases, creating new data structures instead of mutating existing ones can have performance implications.
  3. Debugging: Stack traces can be more complex due to function composition.

Ramda provides a robust toolkit for functional programming in JavaScript, encouraging clean, modular, and reusable code. Its emphasis on immutability and function composition can lead to more maintainable and predictable codebases.

2. Crocks

Crocks is a collection of popular Algebraic Data Types (ADTs) for JavaScript. It's designed to provide a set of functional programming tools that adhere to common algebraic structures found in mathematics, particularly in category theory. Crocks aims to bring more rigor and safety to functional programming in JavaScript.

Core Principles

  1. Algebraic Data Types: Crocks provides a set of ADTs that follow mathematical laws and properties.
  2. Functional Programming: It promotes a pure functional programming style in JavaScript.
  3. Composition: Emphasizes the composition of functions and data types.
  4. Type Safety: Aims to bring more type safety to JavaScript, despite its dynamically typed nature.

Key Features

  1. ADT Implementations: Provides implementations of common ADTs like Maybe, Either, State, Reader, Writer, and more.
  2. Helper Functions: Includes a variety of helper functions for working with these ADTs.
  3. Pointfree Functions: Offers a collection of functions designed for pointfree programming.
  4. Fantasy Land Compliance: Implements the Fantasy Land specification for algebraic JavaScript.

Common ADTs and Functions

  • Maybe: Represents optional values and helps avoid null checks.
  • Either: Represents values with two possibilities, often used for error handling.
  • Result: A specialized version of Either focused on representing success or failure.
  • State: Represents computations which carry state.
  • Reader: Represents computations which can read from a shared environment.
  • Writer: Represents computations which can produce a stream of output.
  • Async: Represents asynchronous computations.
  • compose, pipe: Functions for composing other functions.
  • curry: Function for currying other functions.
  • map, chain, ap: Common operations on ADTs.

Example Usage

const { compose, curry, map, Maybe } = require('crocks')

// A safe division function using Maybe
const safeDivide = curry((n, d) => (d === 0 ? Maybe.Nothing() : Maybe.Just(n / d)))

// Compose functions to safely divide and then double the result
const safeDoubleDiv = compose(
  map((x) => x * 2),
  safeDivide(10)
)

console.log(safeDoubleDiv(2).option('Cannot divide')) // 10
console.log(safeDoubleDiv(0).option('Cannot divide')) // "Cannot divide"

// Using Either for error handling
const { Either } = require('crocks')
const { Left, Right } = Either

const sqrt = (n) =>
  n < 0 ? Left('Cannot calculate square root of negative number') : Right(Math.sqrt(n))

console.log(
  sqrt(-1).either(
    (error) => `Error: ${error}`,
    (value) => `The result is ${value}`
  )
) // "Error: Cannot calculate square root of negative number"

console.log(
  sqrt(4).either(
    (error) => `Error: ${error}`,
    (value) => `The result is ${value}`
  )
) // "The result is 2"

Benefits of Using Crocks

  1. Type Safety: Provides more robust error handling and type safety in JavaScript.
  2. Functional Patterns: Encourages the use of functional programming patterns.
  3. Composability: Makes it easier to compose complex operations from simple ones.
  4. Predictability: ADTs with well-defined behaviors lead to more predictable code.
  5. Error Handling: Provides elegant solutions for handling errors and edge cases.

Considerations

  1. Learning Curve: Requires understanding of functional programming concepts and algebraic structures.
  2. Paradigm Shift: May require a significant change in coding style for developers used to imperative programming.
  3. Ecosystem Integration: Might not integrate as seamlessly with existing JavaScript ecosystems that are more imperative in nature.
  4. Performance: In some cases, the abstraction provided by ADTs might come with a performance cost.

Crocks is particularly useful for developers who want to write more robust, functional code in JavaScript, especially those familiar with functional programming concepts from languages like Haskell or Scala. It provides a way to bring some of the benefits of strongly typed functional programming to JavaScript.

3. Lodash

Lodash is a modern JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions to simplify programming tasks. It's designed to enhance JavaScript's functional programming capabilities and make working with arrays, numbers, objects, strings, etc., more efficient and convenient.

Core Principles

  1. Utility-First: Lodash focuses on providing practical utility functions for common programming tasks.
  2. Consistency: Lodash maintains consistent function names and behaviors across different data types.
  3. Performance: Many Lodash functions are optimized for performance.
  4. Modularity: Lodash can be imported as a whole or as individual functions to reduce bundle size.

Key Features

  1. Array Operations: Extensive functions for manipulating and querying arrays.
  2. Object Manipulation: Tools for working with object properties and transformations.
  3. Function Utilities: Helpers for function composition, currying, and controlling invocation.
  4. String Manipulation: Various string formatting and manipulation functions.
  5. Number Operations: Mathematical and numeric utility functions.
  6. Collection Functions: Methods that work on both arrays and objects.
  7. Lazy Evaluation: Chaining interface for more efficient operations on large collections.

Common Functions

Some frequently used Lodash functions include:

  • _.map: Create a new array with the results of calling a function on every element.
  • _.filter: Create an array of elements that pass a test.
  • _.reduce: Reduce a collection to a single value.
  • _.find: Find the first element in a collection that matches a condition.
  • _.debounce: Create a debounced version of a function.
  • _.throttle: Create a throttled version of a function.
  • _.merge: Recursively merge objects.
  • _.cloneDeep: Create a deep clone of a value.
  • _.groupBy: Group elements in a collection by a given criteria.

Example Usage

const _ = require('lodash')

const users = [
  { user: 'fred', age: 48 },
  { user: 'barney', age: 34 },
  { user: 'fred', age: 40 },
  { user: 'barney', age: 36 },
]

// Get the average age of users
const averageAge = _.meanBy(users, 'age')
console.log(averageAge) // 39.5

// Group users by name
const groupedUsers = _.groupBy(users, 'user')
console.log(groupedUsers)
// {
//   fred: [{ user: 'fred', age: 48 }, { user: 'fred', age: 40 }],
//   barney: [{ user: 'barney', age: 34 }, { user: 'barney', age: 36 }]
// }

// Deep cloning an object
const originalObject = { a: 1, b: { c: 2 } }
const clonedObject = _.cloneDeep(originalObject)

Benefits of Using Lodash

  1. Productivity: Provides ready-to-use functions for common tasks, reducing boilerplate code.
  2. Cross-browser Consistency: Ensures consistent behavior across different browsers and platforms.
  3. Performance: Many functions are optimized for performance, especially when working with large datasets.
  4. Reduced Bugs: Well-tested utility functions can lead to fewer bugs in application code.

Considerations

  1. Bundle Size: Including the entire Lodash library can increase your application's bundle size. However, you can import only the functions you need.
  2. Native Alternatives: Modern JavaScript has incorporated many features that were previously unique to Lodash, so always check if a native solution exists.
  3. Learning Curve: While Lodash is generally intuitive, there's still a learning curve to understand all its functions and best practices.

Lodash remains a popular choice for JavaScript developers due to its comprehensive set of utility functions, consistent API, and focus on performance. It can significantly simplify many common programming tasks and promote more readable and maintainable code.

4. Underscore

Underscore is one of the oldest and most established utility libraries for JavaScript. It provides a collection of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects. Underscore paved the way for many modern JavaScript features and inspired libraries like Lodash.

Core Principles

  1. Functional Programming: Underscore promotes functional programming paradigms in JavaScript.
  2. No Extensions: Underscore doesn't extend built-in objects, making it safer to use in large codebases.
  3. Consistency: Provides a consistent functional programming interface for JavaScript.
  4. Cross-browser Compatibility: Ensures consistent behavior across different browsers and platforms.

Key Features

  1. Collections: Functions to work with both arrays and objects (like each, map, reduce, filter).
  2. Arrays: Specific helpers for array manipulation.
  3. Objects: Utilities for working with object properties and transformations.
  4. Functions: Tools for function composition, binding, and controlling invocation.
  5. Utility: Miscellaneous helper functions for common programming tasks.
  6. Chaining: Allows for chained function calls for more readable code.

Common Functions

Some frequently used Underscore functions include:

  • _.each: Iterate over a list of elements.
  • _.map: Create a new array with the results of calling a function on every element.
  • _.reduce: Reduce a list of values to a single value.
  • _.filter: Return all elements that pass a truth test.
  • _.find: Look through a list and return the first element that passes a truth test.
  • _.where: Return all elements that match the given properties.
  • _.extend: Copy all properties from source objects to a destination object.
  • _.debounce: Create a debounced version of a function.
  • _.template: Create a compiled template function.

Example Usage

const _ = require('underscore')

const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

// Using map to double each number
const doubled = _.map(numbers, (num) => num * 2)
console.log(doubled) // [2, 4, 6, 8, 10]

// Using reduce to sum the numbers
const sum = _.reduce(numbers, (memo, num) => memo + num, 0)
console.log(sum) // 15

// Using where to find objects with specific properties
const users = [
  { name: 'John', age: 25 },
  { name: 'Jane', age: 30 },
  { name: 'John', age: 35 },
]
const johnsOver30 = _.where(users, { name: 'John', age: 35 })
console.log(johnsOver30) // [{name: 'John', age: 35}]

// Using template
const compiled = _.template('Hello <%= name %>')
console.log(compiled({ name: 'John' })) // "Hello John"

Benefits of Using Underscore

  1. Simplicity: Provides a simple and consistent API for common programming tasks.
  2. Legacy Support: Works well in older codebases and browsers.
  3. Functional Paradigm: Encourages functional programming practices in JavaScript.
  4. Documentation: Extensive and well-maintained documentation.

Considerations

  1. Modern Alternatives: Many of Underscore's features are now available in native JavaScript or more modern libraries like Lodash.
  2. Performance: In some cases, native JavaScript methods or more specialized libraries might offer better performance.
  3. Bundle Size: Including Underscore adds to your application's bundle size, though it's relatively lightweight.
  4. Active Development: While still maintained, Underscore is not as actively developed as some newer alternatives.

Underscore remains a solid choice for projects that require broad browser support or maintain legacy codebases. Its influence on JavaScript development is significant, and many developers still appreciate its straightforward, functional approach to utility functions.

5.RxJS

RxJS (Reactive Extensions for JavaScript) is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. It provides one core type, the Observable, satellite types (Observer, Schedulers, Subjects) and operators inspired by Array methods (map, filter, reduce, every, etc) to allow handling asynchronous events as collections.

Core Principles

  1. Reactive Programming: RxJS is built around the concept of reactive programming, which focuses on asynchronous data streams.
  2. Functional Programming: It leverages functional programming concepts for transforming and combining streams of data.
  3. Composition: RxJS emphasizes the composition of operations on data streams.
  4. Declarative: It allows for a more declarative programming style, especially when dealing with complex asynchronous operations.

Key Concepts

  1. Observable: Represents a stream of data or events over time.
  2. Observer: Consumes the values delivered by an Observable.
  3. Subscription: Represents the execution of an Observable.
  4. Operators: Pure functions that enable functional programming style transformations of Observables.
  5. Subject: A special type of Observable that allows values to be multicasted to many Observers.
  6. Schedulers: Control the execution context and timing of subscription and notifications.

Common Operators

RxJS provides a wide range of operators for working with Observables:

  • map: Transform the items emitted by an Observable by applying a function to each item.
  • filter: Emit only those items from an Observable that pass a predicate test.
  • mergeMap: Transform the items emitted by an Observable into Observables, then flatten the emissions.
  • switchMap: Map to Observable, complete previous inner Observable, emit values.
  • concat: Join multiple Observables together by sequentially emitting their values.
  • combineLatest: Combine the latest values from multiple Observables.
  • debounceTime: Discard emitted values that take less than the specified time between outputs.
  • takeUntil: Emit values until a second Observable emits a value.

Example Usage

import { fromEvent, interval } from 'rxjs'
import { map, filter, takeUntil } from 'rxjs/operators'

// Create an Observable that emits click events
const clicks$ = fromEvent(document, 'click')

// Create an Observable that emits a value every second
const timer$ = interval(1000)

// Use operators to transform the timer Observable
const subscription = timer$
  .pipe(
    map((i) => i + 1),
    filter((i) => i % 2 === 0),
    takeUntil(clicks$)
  )
  .subscribe(
    (value) => console.log(`Even number: ${value}`),
    (err) => console.error(err),
    () => console.log('Completed')
  )

// This will log even numbers every 2 seconds until a click event occurs

Benefits of Using RxJS

  1. Handling Complex Async Operations: Simplifies management of multiple async operations and their interdependencies.
  2. Composition: Allows for easy composition of async operations using a functional programming style.
  3. Declarative Approach: Enables a more declarative approach to handling async data flows.
  4. Cancellation: Built-in mechanisms for cancelling async operations.
  5. Rich Ecosystem: Extensive set of operators for various use cases.
  6. Error Handling: Provides robust error handling mechanisms for async operations.

Considerations

  1. Learning Curve: The concepts in RxJS can be challenging for developers new to reactive programming.
  2. Debugging: Debugging RxJS code can be more complex due to its asynchronous nature.
  3. Overuse: Not every async operation needs the power of RxJS; simpler solutions might suffice for basic scenarios.
  4. Bundle Size: Including the full RxJS library can significantly increase your bundle size, though tree-shaking can help mitigate this.

RxJS is particularly powerful for applications dealing with complex streams of asynchronous events, such as real-time data, user interactions, or when coordinating multiple async operations. It's widely used in frameworks like Angular and can be a game-changer for managing application state and side effects in large-scale applications.

Discuss on Twitter • View on GitHub